Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Post #8: Battle of the Styles

William Robinson
During the last quarter of the 19th century, there was a Battle of the Styles over the future of garden designs. The main two characters in the Battle were William Robinson on one side, and Sedding and Sir Reginal Blomfield on the other. Robinson believed that horticulturists should be the ones responsible for designing gardens, not architects. As a gardener himself, he thought gardens could be independent and not simply stand as ornamentation to the architecture of a house. He also was very interested in having more natural looking gardens. Now that is not to say he wanted landscapes like Kent, because he certainly did not. Rather, he wanted to stay away from the highly formalized garden structures. He believed Versailles and Crystal Palace represented the evils of gardening. Robinson also had a vested interest in naturally grouping hardy plants, and he also enjoyed having exotic plants in gardens.

Sir Reginald Blomfield


On the opposing side of the battlefield were the architects. J. D. Sedding and Sir Reginald Blomfield believed that garden design should be based around the architecture of the building. They also believed in more formal gardening styles and techniques. Unfortunately, Sedding died before the publication of his book Garden Craft Old and New. Therefore, he was not able to defend Robinson’s attack on the work. Then, Blomfield came to play and stood up for the architects in this battle.


Both sides were very invested in their cases and refused to compromise. Therefore, in the end, it was not an architect or a gardener that won, but the collaboration of architects and gardeners. Gertrude Jekyll and Sir Edwin Lutyens represent this perfect union of architect and gardener. They were able to achieve something greater than what either side could have achieved on their own.
Sir Edwin Lutyens

Gertrude Jekyll















Image sources:

1 comment:

  1. Great overview on the works of Robinson versus those of Blomfield and Sedding. Robinson definitely was more interested in how gardens could be naturalistic, despite being designed. Blomfield and Sedding were more interested in how gardens should continue to be formal, while also appearing naturalistic.

    ReplyDelete